Another part of the bill would extend unemployment insurance. My Cato Institute colleague Chris Edwards explains why this is bad policy:Ronald Reagan said it best,"government is not the solution,it is the problem."
any stimulus from UI benefits will be counteracted by the anti-stimulus of the higher taxes needed to pay for them. Many states have been raising their UI taxes on businesses in order to replenish their unemployment funds, and these tax increases are surely harming job creation.Leave it to Congress to create more long-term problems with every step they take trying to deal with the economy. This may be the most important argument on behalf of a policy of laissez faire. Private markets are far from perfect. But politicians always in every case make a bigger mess of things!
Another negative effect of UI benefits is that they increase unemployment because they reduce the incentive for people to find work. Higher UI benefits delay the need for people to make tough choices about their careers, such as switching industries, taking lower pay, or moving to a different city. It's a basic rule that when the government subsidizes something, we get more of it.
Musings on history,most especially on the War Between The States,southern culture and anything else that may tickle my fancy or riles my blood.
Monday, December 19, 2011
Extending Unemployment Insurance,Is In Reality A Tax On Employers
Via The American Spectator:
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment