An Inmate Gets 40% Of The Vote Against Obama In The West Virgina Primary

This sounds like a crazy question from the Match Game,'people are so fed up with Obama,that instead of voting for him,they voted for a blank?'40% of Democrats in West Virgina answered that question by voting for a convicted extortioner,Keith Judd, over the sitting POTUS.Only Charles Nelson Riley answered differently,he voted for Rip Taylor.

'Merchants Of Despair'

If we want those 30 million conservatives that do not vote to turn out in November,we need to stop nominating men like George H. W. Bush,Bob Dole,George W. Bush,John McCain,and this years presumptive nominee,Mitt Romney.In the case of Romney,I'm still 'hopeing against hope' Ron Paul will find enough delegates to at least force the GOP to find another nominee,if he can not be its nominee himself.

Democrats Are Trying To Nip Marco Rubio In The Bud

Verbatim post from The Daily Caller:

There seems to be an orchestrated effort emerging to undermine Sen. Marco Rubio. At least, that’s how it looks.
On the heels of that recent and terribly flawed Reuters story, there have been multiple other shots fired his direction. Some of this may simply speak to Rubio’s level of activity and effectiveness. But the assault hardly seems organic.
Consider the last week, or so, as an example.
During a press briefing this week, White House press secretary Jay Carney took aim at Rubio’s proposed bi-partisan legislation on the religious liberty issue. And a video produced by the DNC also cast Rubio as Obama’s primary adversary over the religious liberty/contraception fight, calling his views “extreme.”
News revealing that Sen. Rubio had hired a firm to research his own background (a smart move for any politician) was “brought to BuzzFeed’s attention by American Bridge, a Democratic opposition research group.”(It’s worth noting American Bridge has previously admitted to targeting Rubio.)
And with another day comes another Rubio story. Politico is out today with what appears to be the latest attempt planted by the Obama Administration to undermine Rubio.
This lasest story seems to be a big nothing burger. Still, this should be viewed in context — not as a stand-alone — but rather as the latest example of a larger effort to strangle the baby in the crib — to undermine one of the few Republicans viewed to be an existential threat to the future of liberalism in America.

With every passing day the likely-hood of a GOP brokered convention becomes more and more possible. Obama and the Democrats are not going to sit back and wait for the GOP to decide on a nominee and then attack him or her.They are going to be more proactive and attack potential threats now and Marco Rubio maybe the biggest potential threat to Obama and a 2nd term in the Republican party.

'George Will "Romney Is The Republican Party's Michael Dukakis'

George Will is spot on,comparing Romney to Dukakis.If the GOP nominate Romney,they will suffer the same defeat that the Democrats and Dukakis suffered in 1988.

The question is now,whether the GOP establishment is ready to jump ship for another candidate and whom that candidate might be?I'm thinking they will choose Perry if the jump.

Hat tip to Ward World Politics.

'Liberals Vow To Challege Obama In Democratic Primaries'

From The Washington Times:

In search of candidates, Mr. Nader and the others sent out a letter, endorsed by 45 “distinguished leaders,”to elected officials, civic leaders, academics and members of the progressive community who specialize among other things in labor, poverty, military and foreign policy. The list, they said, also includes progressive Democrats who have held national and state office and have fought for progressive reforms.

These are far left radicals and really doesn't change the odds that Obama will be replaced at the head of the Democratic ticket in 2012,but it is continueing evidence that the natives are getting restless and fear they may recieve a thrashing next year.

Could Obama Not Be The Dem Nominee In 2012?

Andrew Breitbart:

Many Democrats are awakening to the reality that their party has been hijacked by a radicalism completely unfamiliar to their parents’ and grandparents’ Democratic Party.
An internal, partisan civil war is now brewing in that party. What I think tonight is less important than what Joe Lieberman, Bill Clinton, Evan Bayh, and the rest of the former, and now defunct, reasonable wing of the Democratic Party is thinking tonight.

The odds are still in Obama's favor,but those odds narrowed last night with the Dems losing the NY-9 special election,that he will be the party's nominee in 2012.If the Dems lose any significant portion of the Jewish vote,then it opens up the possibility that NY state could be competitive next year and the impossibility that the Dems can win in FL.With out the Children of Israel,a defeat next November may turn into a rout for Democrats.

BTW,you know the Democratic Party has gone extreme,when you can use both,Bill Clinton,and reasonable, in the same sentence.:p

 

The Largest Non- Budget Cut In U.S. History

From My Way News;

The details of the agreement reached late Friday night just ahead of a deadline for a partial government shutdown reveal a lot of one-time savings and cuts that officially "score" as cuts to pay for spending elsewhere, but often have little to no actual impact on the deficit.
As a result of the legerdemain, Obama was able to reverse many of the cuts passed by House Republicans in February when the chamber approved a bill slashing this year's budget by more than $60 billion. In doing so, the White House protected favorites like the Head Start early learning program, while maintaining the maximum Pell grant of $5,550 and funding for Obama's "Race to the Top" initiative that provides grants to better-performing schools.
Instead, the cuts that actually will make it into law are far tamer, including cuts to earmarks, unspent census money, leftover federal construction funding, and $2.5 billion from the most recent renewal of highway programs that can't be spent because of restrictions set by other legislation. Another $3.5 billion comes from unused spending authority from a program providing health care to children of lower-income families.

All John Boehner and the Republicans accomplished was to rearrange the chairs on a sinking ship.From Obama and the Democrats you expect it,but if the Republicans wont stand up for fiscal discipline who will.

The Hypocrisy Of The Anti-War Left

Michael Filozof at the American Thinker;

President Obama has just committed American forces to engage in acts of war against Moammar Qaddafi. Where are the protesters? Where are the accusations that Obama is a liar and a Nazi? Where are the groups of "artists" wishing death upon the "warmonger" Obama? Where are the cries for Obama's impeachment? There aren't any, and there won't be any, either. Obama - who made a fetish out of his opposition to the "surge" in Iraq, yet ordered a "surge" of his own in Afghanistan - has just committed American forces to combat action against a third Muslim country. No matter. He won the Nobel Peace Prize a priori. The Left regards him as a man of peace in its own mind; the facts are irrelevant. 

 

The Left's hypocrisy on matters of war and peace is sickening. When the Democratic Party is in power, it routinely commits America to war. When Republicans are in power, Democrats engage in shameless demagoguery and paint the Republicans as bloodthirsty warmongers.

The anti-war left is nothing more than the monkey that dances to the tune that the Democratic party plays on its organ.When Republicans are in the White House war is bad.When Democrats are in the White House war is good.Hypocrites!

Ron Paul Takes On Pro-Choice Busybodies

From Free North Carolina;

Ron Paul is brilliant here.He exposes the left's hypocrisy concerning freedom and choice.The only time the liberals ever favor choice is (unless your the unborn) concerning abortion.In every thing else they (the libs) want to restrict what choices we can make.Whether it is what car we choose to drive to the light bulbs we use in our homes,they have decided they are better informed to make those choices for us.The truth is Rand Paul and other like minded conservatives are far more Pro-Choice than the most moderate Democrat is.

We Are All Americans

Today,in her column,Michelle Malkin responded to Attorney General Eric Holder's and President Barak Obama's racist comments;

My fellow Americans, who are “your people”? I ask because U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder, who is black, used the phrase “my people” in congressional testimony this week. It was an unmistakably color-coded and exclusionary reference intended to deflect criticism of the Obama Justice Department’s selective enforcement policies.

And;

Katrina Pierson is my people. She’s a feisty young Texas mom and Dallas tea party activist who supports limited government principles and rejects left-wing identity politics. She confronted the NAACP last year with a rousing manifesto of political independence and rebutted the left-wing group’s attacks on the tea party as racist:
“The reality is that we colored people no longer require the assistance from other Negros for advancement,” Pierson said. “These groups run to the rescue of distressed brown people only when the media deems it newsworthy. Meanwhile, there are inner city black children who continue to grow up fatherless while sharing a neighborhood with stray bullets, drugs and a plethora of liquor stores on every corner. … I don’t believe that the true meaning of this nation’s creed was to move black people from one form of slavery to another.”
The NAACP, she observed, is made up of “Democrats who bow to a Democrat master today as they once did over 200 years ago. Once this is realized by the forgotten society, race in this country will be as irrelevant as those who thrive off of it.” Amen, sister.

Here is her response to Obama's claim that the Tea Party is racist;

According to U.S. News and World Report’s Kenneth Walsh, President Obama told guests at a private White House dinner that he believed the tea party movement had a “subterranean agenda” of racism against him. But Lt. Col. West summed up the movement’s transcendent, post-racial agenda forthrightly:
“The tea party is a constitutional, conservative grassroots movement — and that’s it. The tea party stands for three things: They want to see effective, efficient constitutional government, they stand for national security, and they stand for free market, free enterprise solutions. That’s it.“
It’s government of, by and for the people — all the people. Not just the ones still shackled by reflexive Democratic Party loyalty. We are beholden not to our skin pigment or ethnic tribes, but to American ideals, tradition, history and faith in the individual.

Read Michelle's full column here.

Today the Democratic party,the radical left,chooses to define themselves by the hyphen that denotes their race,creed or gender.They define themselves by what divides us rather than on what unites us.Instead of,"We the people",it has become,"my people."

Camelot,Spamelot

 The media was full of stories this past week,commemorating the 50th anniversary of the inauguration of John F. Kennedy as the 35th President of the United States on Jan 20 1961.While the media was awash in nostalgia of the revision of history,they call"Camelot,"I began to notice a tremendous difference between the ideal's of the present Democratic party to those expressed by JFK,a quarter of a century ago.
 In Kennedy's inaugural address he made this declaration;"...the belief that the rights of man come not from the generosity of the state, but from the hand of God."
 The Democratic party  firmly believes the opposite today.They have no concept of Natural Rights,failing to understand that man's natural disposition is to be free.They believe that even our daily lives should be regulated to every last detail.Telling us what we should eat,where we should live,what mode of transportation we should use,even what kind of light bulbs we should use to light our homes.They view the people as ward's of the state,not,as it should be,the government as a ward of the people.
 The most famous line from the inaugural address was this;"Ask not what your country can do for you - ask what you can do for your country"
 This runs counter to all the various groups who comprise the Democratic parties base of support.They are a collection of grievance mongers,seeking to receive from the federal government what they believe they are entitled to because of their gender,race,creed,or sexual orientation,in the name of equality.They do or produce nothing to improve their station in life or that of their community,but rather seek the government to rectify the wrongs they believe have been perpetrated against them.
 JFK also avows this in his speech;"Let us never negotiate out of fear. But let us never fear to negotiate."
 And this;"For only when our arms are sufficient beyond doubt can we be certain beyond doubt that they will never be employed."
 In these 2 quotes Kennedy affirms the doctrine of peace through strength.The Democratic party today seeks peace through appeasement,which is peace through weakness.They refuse to learn the lesson's of history,that tyrants care not one red cent for our good intentions ,but for our ability to defend ourselves against their tyrannical desires.If you project weakness,you shall surely be attacked.If you project strength you will produce peace and be secure.

 Though the Democratic party invokes the name and memory of John F. Kennedy,his spirit is far removed from what they are today.